Skip to main content

Motorola Moto G Review



This review is incredibly late, I know this, you know this and Motorola knows this (but it's only really me that cares it's late) The Motorola Moto G was announced in November 2013 and was made available later that same month 2013, We are now in September 2014 and yesterday Motorola took the wraps off of the 2014 Moto G, whilst I will hopefully be getting one of those soon, this review is of the 2013, Non-LTE version, from someone who has been using it as their daily driver since early January.

The Moto G is a really quite amazing device, launching at £140 (or thereabouts) you got a device that wasn't cringe worthy, the phrase "you get what you pay for" doesn't really apply here, you get far more for your money than you would think, I could sit here and rattle off specs from a list and bore you all, but i wont, I'll go over the most important specs of the phone and how my experiences with them were.

The Screen
At 4.5", the 720p IPS panel on the Moto G is nothing short of amazing at this price point. Is it the most awesome display in the world? of course not, don't be a moron, but, can you get a device with a better screen for £140, dear god no, you have to get to the £200-£300 price range to get similar displays, Motorola cut the right corners the the G, and it's not possible for me to say they cut corners on the screen, not with a straight face anyway.

The 720p resolution on the 4.5" screen means you get a PPI rating of 326, so it's above that 300PPI threshold that means from a normal distance (i.e not 2mm from your eye) it'll look almost identical to an iPhone 4S, its just an inch larger diagonally, colours look pretty good, it obviously wont look at good as something like the Galaxy S5 (because it's AMOLED) and it wont look as great as an HTC One M8 which uses a far more expensive S-LCD panel, the screen on the M8 probably costs more than the entire Moto G, so put it into perspective, the colours look good but not great, the same with touch response, HTC did some magic with the M8 line (including the One Mini 2) and got crazy low screen latency, to make it feel even faster than it is, but again, the One mini 2 costs more than double the Moto G's price, lets not even get to the full sized M8. The Moto G gets bright, i don't have the tools to give yo an actual number, but in daylight i have no issues with it (especially in auto brightness) and at night, it gets dark ,but not dark enough, it still hurts my eyes if i look at it at 3am with hazy eyes, but again, if you take into consideration it's price, this screen shouldn't be able to exist in a phone of this price.

The Cameras
5mp on the back and 1.3mp on the front, nothing ground breaking here and honestly they are the weakest points of the device, specifically the rear camera, we are used to front facing camera's being rubbish and ignored, so the front facing camera here is Galaxy S3/HTC One X quality, not amazing, but not terrible, it's a front facing camera, it shoots 720p video and you'll take selfies with it no matter what, Snapchat will be as prevalent and weird as ever.
No one wants to see this, don't make me take more selfies

 The rear camera on the other hand, is pretty terrible, yes it is possible to get some good shots, i have done just that once or twice, but it  was in very optimal conditions, HDR was set to firmly be on, there was ample lighting, little wind, and the subject was still, i shot flowers because they are relatively easy to shoot, I'll have  shots from the Moto G below, but I'll say one last thing before moving on, Google+ Auto-Awesome has been a lifesaver for this camera for me.






Video on the Moto G is a plus and a minus, it only shoots video at 720p which is a tad disappointing, but, and it's a pretty big but, unless you have a Google Play edition (or forced yours into a Google Play edition like i recently did) you can also shoot 720p 60fps slow motion video, and it actually looks pretty good, it's a bit choppy, but if you realise how little processing power exists in the Moto G, the fact you can shoot slow-mo video at all is pretty amazing, just whatever you do, disable audio, dear god disable video, i don't even know why there is an option for audio when you record slow motion, it sounds like a Cyberman got wrecked on the weekend with a Dalek and had one too many Jägermeister shots.

The Performance
The Snapdragon 400, the MSM8226 specifically is the chip that has blown away many people in the tech community, the SD400 is a lowly chip, a low power part made for cheap devices, it uses 4 ARM cortex A7's, a reference design from ARM and not the custom Krait cores Qualcomm designs, a CPU we are only used to seeing in the cheap SoC's from people like MediaTek and Rockchip, not exactly known for their performance. and it has a GPU made by Qualcomm's in house graphics group (fun fact, Qualcomm hired a group of devs from AMD, AMD makes radeon cards, and the Adreno name is an anagram of Radeon) the Adreno 305 is not a powerful GPU, it's again designed to push lower resolution screens, the highest it can push is 1280x800, so the Moto G is pushing it, but honestly playing with it, you'd never know.

I'm not going to show you benchmark results, because who actually cares, the interesting part is, that even after near 9 months of use, the Moto G is just as fast as the day i got it, i don't know what trickery Motorola has done to the Moto G, but honestly, i find it hard to tell the performance difference doing normal things between this and my Nexus 4. It is possible to bog the Moto G down, the 1.2Ghz SD400 isn't as fast as the 2.5Ghz SD800, it just isn't, but i don't notice unless i try to do some gaming,  games like Flappy Bird, Swing copters, Angry birds etc will all play will ease, not even a stutter, but Asphalt 8, Deus Ex: The Fall, and Batman Arkham Origins will suffer, but if you buy an inexpensive phone and are expecting to play games that in some cases have near console quality, you are insane. Likewise 1GB of RAM helps the Moto G get it's price down, but doesn't help it with multi-tasking, it's gotten better with the 4.4.4 KitKat update, but don't expect to have Skype, Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat and swing copters all in RAM, you will be kicked out quite often, keep you expectations levelled, the Moto G is a marvel, but it's not a miracle worker.

The Battery
It's pretty dope, that's all i need to say really, the non-removable 2070mAh Lithium-ion battery lasts all day, from when i wake up at 8am until i go to sleep at near midnight, unless i am streaming Google play music all day, i have no worries that it'll make it through the day, and i don't know if this is just me, but it also seems to charge quite quickly, in about an hour and 15 minutes i can go from 5% all the way to 100%. 4 hours screen on time is no problem with the Moto G, and all of this is when i have my Sony Smartwatch 2 connected, which uses the far less efficient Bluetooth 3.0 rather than the Bluetooth 4 with LE that most new wearables are coming out with, It uses a standard MicroUSB 2.0 connector, so you can use any charger you want with it, also any battery pack you could ever want, as long as it has a MicroUSB connector/a USB port for you to add a MicroUSB cable to, Ah standards, wouldn't it be great if everyone adhered to them.

The Rest
Motorola hit a home run with the Moto G, it's their best selling smartphone, ever, and you can see why, the Moto G is downright amazing for it's price, having a decent sized screen with acceptable colour reproduction and (for the price) a high resolution screen, it's plenty fast, and it's stayed fast, even with a load of junk on my phone it's never gotten unbearably slow, so kudos to Motorola on whatever trickery they imparted on the Moto G, because this doesn't feel like a £140 smartphone, and it most certainly doesn't feel like a £140 smartphone that has been used and abused for nearly 9 months.

The build quality is astounding for the price, it's no HTC One M8 which is 90% aluminium, no the Moto G is all plastic, the rear shells are replaceable, mine came with the black shell on and i got bored so i replaced it with the pink shell that i got free in the box, there is no creaking, no flexing, no torquing or anything, the Moto G is just a solidly built device, again, I'm going to sound like a broken record, this is built like a device that far exceeds it's price tag. The dimple on the back is just perfect, whoever thought about it at Motorola, give the man (or Woman) a raise, because its perfect, its right where my index finger sits, and if Motorola where to ever do a fingerprint scanner, they should put it there, do a tap and hold scanner like Apple (and now Huawei) so there is no swiping nonsense, just tap and unlock, perfect placement.

If you really want to know the dimensions i can tell you them, its 130mm tall, 66mm wide and 11.6mm thick, and you know what? it means jack all, the Moto G feels pretty damn perfect in the hand, there are curves in all the correct places and the weight (143g) is distributed evenly, its not overly top or bottom heavy, it doesn't feel like a lead weight and it doesn't feel unsubstantial, it just feels right.

Wrapping up
Would i recommend the Moto G? no, but not because it's a bad phone, not by any stretch of the imagination, i wouldn't recommend this Moto G, the 3G one, because there is this exact same phone now available for a slightly increased price that includes 4G LTE and it includes a MicroSD slot (to complement the 8GB internal storage) and as of yesterday, the 2014 Moto G got announced, it's a 5" 720p screen, its got improved cameras 8mp on the back and 2mp on the front, it's got front facing STEREO speakers (think of Boomsound from HTC and whatever Sony calls it on the Z2/Z3/Z3c) and that also has a MicroSD card slot, but this has 8 or 16GB of storage, but no LTE, pick your poison, so that's why i wouldn't recommend this Moto G, but as a range and as a family in general, if you're on a budget or just no longer want to buy phones on contract, this is bloody amazing and it's going to be hard to recommend something else.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Should People consider a mid-range phone for their next upgrade?

2013 has been a bit of an odd year,for Smartphones that is, Every year we are basically conditioned to believe that we want the biggest and best phones that are available at that time, but that's actually changing,This year we have seen OEM's create "mini" versions of their phones, and for once, They.Don't.Suck This, is the Galaxy S4 Mini, From Samsung, it doesn't have the most mind-blowing specs , its a dual-core Snapdragon 400 (Krait 300) , it's got an 8MP camera from the Galaxy S III, it's pretty thin and pretty light, it's got a 4.3" qHD (960x540)  Super AMOLED screen, also the Design of the Galaxy S4 and some other stuff. And guess what, it's doesn't lag,and the Minor bits of lag that are there are Touchwiz based,which are being remedied as we speak, same as the Larger Galaxy S4, which ad software glitches which caused it to lag, they are being ironed out as we speak. And yes, the Screen might not be HD, but it kinda does...

Why I'm not a fan of the OnePlus 2

Photo credit from GSMArena To those that Follow me on twitter it's no surprise to you that I was very underwhelmed with the OnePlus 2, but it's hard to explain why in 140 Characters, so here I'm going to expand a bit more on the things I’m not a fan of and why. First up is the USB-C Port. Now as we already know, USB-C the Port isn’t the same as USB-C W/USB3.1, the Damn USB-C, it's there,but not quite there. latter is the all singing all dancing version of USB-C, nothing has this yet (the closest we have so far is the new MacBook and Chromebook Pixel, that use most of this, except at USB3 speeds, or what has retroactively been called, USB3.1 Gen1). The OnePlus 2 though, like the Nokia N1 before it, isn't doing any of this, it hasn't got support for up to 100w, it doesn’t transfer data at the blisteringly fast 10gbps (USB 3.1 Gen2) or 5gbps (USB3.0/3.1 Gen1), no the USB-C port on the OnePlus 2 is USB2 based, that’s right 480mbps, same as microUSB in ph...

Sony Smartwatch 2 SW2 Review

Launched in the tail end of 2013, the Sony Smartwatch 2 (SW2) is not Sony's most recent wearable, but it's the last in Sony's line of Smartwatches running their own OS. The SW2 is a relatively pretty Smartwatch with a fair few bugs that keeps it from being great. Scratchy scratch number one Utilising an aluminium frame, a "scratch resistant" glass  and a metal strap the SW2 has all the pieces of the puzzle on paper to make it a gorgeous piece of hardware, unfortunately Sony got to the last hurdle and stumbled, they used capacitive navigation buttons which mimic Android's old style ones, before Android 4.0 ICS, the power button on the side was as mushy as all heck and lastly, the scratch proof glass isn't all that scratch proof. The Aluminium frame is anodised black, and chamferred  on the top edges, and just like every device that has ever been chamferred and polished, it scratches and dings so quickly I've forgotten what mine looks like witho...